collections_bookmark Focus and Scope

Educational Concepts, Educational Curriculum, Educational Management, Educational Evaluation, Educational History, Educational Models, Educational Strategies, and Educational Methods.

create_new_folder Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

copyright Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

unarchive Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

bookmark_border Peer Reviewer Prosess

SOP for Manuscript Management

At least two reviewers independently review each manuscript submitted to the Pedagogic Forum in the form of a "double-blind peer review". The decision to accept, accept revisions, or reject is based on their reports/recommendations. In some cases, the editor may submit the article for review by another third reviewer prior to making a decision, if necessary.

bookmark_border Publication Fee

The Educationist Journal does not charge APC fees, filing fees, or other fees. All article publication processes are free of charge.

bookmark_border Open Access Statement

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

bookmark_border Copyright License

COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE STATEMENT

Copyright:

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

Copyright for each article in this Educationist Journal is fully held by the author under the CC BY-SA license.

1. The author retains copyright and grants the journal first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. which allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the journal (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in the current year of the journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchange and earlier and greater citation of the published work.

LICENCE:
Educationist Journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License./CC BY-SA. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compile, modify, and create derivatives of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, as long as credit is given to the author of the original work.
Creative Commons License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

bookmark_border Archive Police

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

bookmark_border Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism Policy
Authors only need to submit manuscripts that are free from plagiarism and academic malpractice. However, editors double-check each article before publication. The first step is to check plagiarism against an offline database developed by the Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary State Islamic University (UIN) Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia. Second, against as many online databases as possible.

bookmark_border Review Guidlines

Review Guidelines for Reviewers

Peer Reviewer Responsibilities
Peer reviewers are tasked with providing criticism by reading and evaluating manuscripts according to their field of expertise, then providing constructive suggestions and honest input to the authors of the submitted articles. Peer reviewers discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, how to improve the strengths and quality of the paper, and evaluate the relevance and originality of the manuscript.

Before reviewing, please note the following:

Does the article you have been asked to review match your expertise? If you receive a manuscript that covers a topic that is not in your area of expertise, please notify the editor as soon as possible. Please recommend alternative reviewers.
Do you have time to review this paper? The review process must be completed within two weeks. If you agree and require a longer period of time, notify the editor as soon as possible, or suggest an alternative reviewer.
Is there a potential conflict of interest? Meanwhile, conflicts of interest will not disqualify you as a reviewer, disclose all conflicts of interest to the editor before reviewing. If you have questions regarding potential conflicts of interest, please do not hesitate to contact the editorial office.
Review Process

When reviewing the article, please consider the following:

Title: does the article describe it clearly?
Abstract: does it reflect the content of the article?
Introduction: does it describe the accuracy of the material presented by the author and clearly state the issue being considered? Typically, the introduction should summarize the relevant research context, and explain the research findings or other findings, if any, that are offered for discussion. This research must explain the experiment, hypothesis and methods.
Article Contents
To determine the originality and suitability of the journal, is there an element of plagiarism in this paper? A quick literature search can use certain tools such as Scopus to see if there are similarities from other parts.

If the research has previously been conducted by another author, does the research still meet the requirements for publication?
Is the article new, in-depth and interesting enough to publish?
does it contribute to knowledge?
Does the article meet the journal's standards?
Scope – Does the article fit the aims and scope of the journal?
Research methods
Comprehensive and perfect:

did the author accurately explain how the data was collected?
Is the theoretical basis or reference used appropriate for this research?
is the exposure design suitable to answer the question?
is there a new method? If there is a new method, does the author explain it in detail?
was there proper sampling?
Are the tools and materials used adequately explained? And
whether the presentation of the article reflects the type of data recorded; accurate in explaining measurements?
Research Findings and Discussion.

This is where the author must explain the findings in his research. It should be structured clearly and in a logical order. You need to consider whether appropriate analysis has been carried out.

are the claims in this section supported by fair and reasonable results?
Does the author compare the results of his research with other previous studies?
Do the research results written in the article contradict previous theories?

Conclusion

This should show the findings clearly. The advantages and disadvantages of the article's findings are also explained, as well as possible research developments.

does the conclusion explain how scientific research should be followed up?
Does the author show his findings clearly and explain the strengths and weaknesses of his research?*
Tables and Figures:
Is the explanation in question appropriate and displays data that is easy for readers to interpret and understand?

Writing Style

Authors must be critical of systematic reviews of literature on issues relevant to their field of study.
Reviews should focus on one topic.
All presentations must be in English and written in a grammatically sound and coherent manner.
Easy to understand
Interesting to read

Originality Research.

Original and test data, should present data that offers new approaches to improve systems, processes and the precision of the tools used.
Observational research and analysis policies must clarify the feasibility, effectiveness and implementation of research results.
In Practice (case study), this paper must explain the situation regarding future challenges in Islamic Theory, Islamic Education, Islamic Law, and Islamic Economics.

Final Review

All review results submitted by reviewers are confidential
If you would like to discuss this article with your colleagues, please inform the editor
Do not contact the author directly.
Ethical issues:
1. Plagiarism: if you suspect that the article is largely plagiarized from other authors, please inform the editor in detail.
2. Fraud: It is very difficult to detect the fraud category, but if you suspect the results of the article are not true, please inform the editor
3. Complete the "Review" before the due date to the editorial team. Your recommendations for the article will be considered when the editor makes a final decision and your honest input is greatly appreciated.
4. When you write a comment, please indicate the part of the comment that is intended for the editor only and the part that can be returned to the author.
5. Don't hesitate to contact the editorial team with any questions or problems you may encounter.