OVERCRIMINALIZATION DALAM PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 9 TAHUN 1975

Adi Syahputra Sirait

doi:10.24952/almaqasid.v6i2.3292

OVERCRIMINALIZATION DALAM PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 9 TAHUN 1975

Adi Syahputra Sirait (IAIN Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia)

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze and explain how the state criminalizes through government regulation Number 9 of 1975 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage which is basically an administrative law, therefore it is not allowed to regulate or create constitutional rules. and contains criminal provisions that have the potential to cause overcriminalization. As a normative legal research, this paper uses a conceptual and statutory approach (State Approach). The results of this study concluded that overcriminalization is the criminalization of acts that are not reprehensible and do not fulfill the principle of lex certa, as well as criminalization of pure administrative violations and their threats are not proportional to the seriousness of the alleged offenses.

Keywords

Overcriminalization dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adisapeotra, Mr. W. F. Prins dan R. Kosim,. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1982.

Adji, Indrianto Seno,. Administratif Penal Law ; Ke arah Konstruksi Pidana Limitatif, Makalah disampaikan pada Pelatihan Hukum dan Kriminologi.

Akbari, Anugerah Rizki,. Potret Kriminalisasi Pasca Reformasi dan Urgensi Reklarifikasi Tindak Pidana di Indonesia, Jakarta : InstituteformCriminalJusticeReform, 2015.

Arief, Barda Nawawi,. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Catakan ketiga, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.

Atmasasmita, Romli., Globalisasi dan Kejahatan Bisnis, Cetakan Ke-1, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Bandung : PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.

Black, Henry Compbell,. Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, United States of America : West Group St. Paul, Minn, 1999.

Gunawan, Hendra,. “Sietam Peradilan Islam” Pada Jurnal el-Qonuniy: Jurnal Ilmu ilmu Kesyari'ahan dan Pranata Sosial Fakultas Syariah dan Ilmu Hukum IAIN Padangsidimpuan, Volume 5 Nomor 1 Edisi Januari-Juni 2019.

Kadish, Sanford H., The Crisisof Overcriminalization, American Criminal Law, 1968.

Luna, Erik,. “The OvercriminalizationPhenomenon”, American University Law Review, 2005.

Muladi, Demokratisasi, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta : The Habibie Center, 2002.

Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Cetakan II, Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2002.

Philipus M. Hadjon, dkk, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia (Introductiontothe Indonesian Administrative Law), Cetakan Kedelapan, Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada UniversityPress, 2002.

Podgor, Ellen S.,. “Overcrminalization The PoliticsofCrimes”, American University Law Review, 2005.

Raphael, Michal Buchhandler,. Overcriminalizing Speech, Cardozo Law Review, 2015.

Saleh, Roeslan,. Beberapa Asas Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif, Jakarta : Aksara Baru, 1983.

Sara Sun Beale,. “The Many Facesof Overcriminalization From Moralsand Materss Tagsto Overfederalization”, American University Law Review, 2005.

Steven Gunkel, Are White Collar Crimesovercriminalization? Some Evidenceonthe Use of Criminal Sanctionsagainst Securities Violators, Western State University Law Review, 2000-2021.

Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Bandung : Alumni, 1981.

Supriadi, “Penetapan Tindak Pidana Sebagai Kejahatan dan Pelanggaran dalam Undang-undang Pidana Khusus”, Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 27,3, 2015.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v6i2.3292