INTERVENSI MILITER AMERIKA SERIKAT DALAM KONFLIK SURIAH TAHUN 2011

Syuryansyah Syuryansyah (Universitas Serang Raya, Indonesia)

Abstract


The United States military intervention in the 2011 Syrian conflict has sparked controversy in the international community. Some parties support the military intervention, viewing it as an effective way to protect civilians, reduce violence, and support opposition groups fighting against the Assad government. However, others oppose the military intervention, viewing it as an action that can increase the number of civilian casualties, escalate tensions between nations, worsen the humanitarian situation in the region, and create an environment that fosters terrorism. This research aims to analyze the reasons and impacts of the United States military intervention in the 2011 Syrian conflict from a positive and negative perspective. The method used is a literature review, collecting data from various sources such as academic journals, books, online articles, and other related sources. The research shows that the United States military intervention in Syria was triggered by political and economic interests and has both positive and negative consequences. Positively, the intervention was able to provide protection for civilians, reduce violence, and support opposition groups. However, there were negative impacts such as an increase in the number of civilian casualties, escalation of tensions between nations, worsening of the humanitarian situation in the region, and the creation of an environment that fosters terrorism.

Keywords


United States; Military Intervention; Syrian Conflict

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, A. K. (2012, 03). Keterlibatan Amerika Serikat di Timur Tengah. Diambil kembali dari http://sinar-hitam.blogspot.co.id/2012/03/keterlibatan-amerika-serikat-di-timur.html

Arlina, P. (2008). In The Geneva Laws. Jakarta.

Bahar, Z., & Hasan, M. N. (2022, Januari 23). Dukungan Amerika Serikat Terhadap Kelompok Oposisi Suriah (The United States Endorsement to Syrian Opposition Groups). Jember.

Budiarjo, M. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Handbook of Qualitative Research. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

EFENDI, I. (2010). Cluster Bombs dan Teori Just War: Perlindungan Sipil dalam Kondisi Perang. Jakarta.

Holsti, K. J. (1983). Politik Internasional Kerangka Untuk Internasional. (A. M.T., Penyunt.) Jakarta: Erlangga.

Holzgrefe, J. (2003). Humanitarian Intervention "Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge Univversity Press.

Holzgrefe, J. (2003). The Humanitarian Intervention. London: Cambridge.

Kompas. (2011, 12 15). Perang Irak Berakhir Hari ini. Diambil kembali dari Kompas Internasional: http://internasional.kompas.com/read/2011/12/15/15251793/Perang.Irak.Berakhir.Hari.Ini

Murray, R. W., & Mckay, A. (Penyunt.). (2014). Into The Eleventh Hour: R2P, Syria and Humanitarianism in Crisis. Bristol: E-International Relations.

Noor, I. (2014, 02 12). analisis intervensi Rusia di Suriah.

Parry, & Grant. (1986). Encylopedic Dictionary of International Law. New York: Oceana Publication.Inc.

Pinem, w. (2016, september 17). Perang menurut Prinsip Machiavelli. Diambil kembali dari Seni Berpikir: https://www.seniberpikir.com/perang-menurut-prinsipmachiavelli/

Recchia, S., & Jennifer, M. W. (2013). jus and unjust Military Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University University.

Sationo, T. I. (2019). HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION MENURUT HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM KONFLIK BERSENJATA. PRANATA HUKUM, 65-88.

Starke, J. (1988). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sulaeman, D. (2013). Prahara Suriah: Membongkar persengkokolan Multinasional. Depok: Pustaka Iman.

Suryohadiprojo, S. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Perang. Jakarta: Pustaka Intermasa.

Syuryansyah. (2016). Perang Dalam Perspektif Islam Kontemporer. Prosiding Interdisciplinary Pistgraduate Student Confrence 2nd, 3.

Teson, F. R. (1985). International Human Rights and Cultural Relativism,. Virginia Journal of International Law, 25(4).

UGM, T. H. (2003). Irak di Bawah Kekuasaan Amerika Serikat: Dampaknya bagi Stabilitas Politik Timur Tengah dan Reaksi (Rakyat) Indonesia”. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Ilmu HUbungan internasional UGM.

Wadjdi, F. (2010). Menantang Amerika: Menyingkap Imperalisme Amerika di Bawah Obama. Bogor: Al Ahzar Press.

Zaki, R. (2017, April). INTERVENSI INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP SURIAH. Diambil kembali dari Binus University of Law: https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2017/04/15/intervensi-internasional-terhadap-suriah/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/tazkir.v9i2.8851

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Syuryansyah Syuryansyah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office:

Institute for Research and Community Services; Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan.

Jl. T. Rizal Nurdin Km. 4,5 Sihitang 22733 Padangsidimpuan, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
Phone: (+62) 634  22080  Faximili: (+62) 634 24022
e-mail: lppm@uinsyahada.ac.id

 

Free counters!

View My Stats