Perbedaan Motivasi Belajar melalui Pendekatan SAVI dengan Variasi Mengajar Stimulus Materi Dimensi Tiga

Lilis Harianti Hasibuan (Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia)

Abstract


Based on the results of the research of the questionnaire score of students learning motivation mathematics then obtained an average of 76 with standard deviation 4.50 in the experimental class applied SAVI approach and average 65 with standard deviation 4.38 on the control class applied Variation Teaching Stimulus. Normality test in experimental class L0 = 0,1296 and Ltabel = 0,1730 then L0 <Ltabel (0,1296 <0,1730) and at control class L0 = 0,1220 and Ltabel = 0,1730 then L0 <Ltabel (0 , 1220 <0.1730) so it can be concluded that student questionnaires of both classes are normally distributed. And homogeneity test results obtained Fhitung<Ftabel that is (1.073 <1.87). Seen from hypothesis test, the data of questionnaire motivation to learn mathematics thitung>ttabel (9,13> 1,674) which H1 accepted which mean there is difference of motivation learn mathematics between SAVI approach with Variation Teaching Stimulus in cube in class VIII student of SMP Negeri 1 Padang year lessons 2015-2016. The results of observations in the experimental class applied SAVI approach obtained an average of 31.81 with a percentage of 79.52% in both categorize and in the experimental class applied Variations Teaching Stimulus obtained an average of 27.4 with percentage 68, 5% is adequately.

Keywords


motivation; SAVI approach; stimulus teaching variation; study; three dimension

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas Gilakjani P. (2012). Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching, 2(1).

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Asril, Z. (2013). Micro Teaching Disertai dengan Pedoman Pengalaman Lapangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

B. Uno, H. (2014). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

DePorter, Bobbi dan Hernacki, M. (2000). Quantum Learning. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving students’ creative mathematical reasoning ability students through adversity quotient and argument driven inquiry learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012005.

Rangkuti, A. N. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitafi, Kualitatif, PTK, dan Penelitian Pengembangan. Bandung: Citaputaka Media.

Sardiman, A. M. (2014). Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suherman, E. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA UPI.

Supardi, U. . (2013). Pengaruh Adversity quotient Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 3(1), 61–71.

Ulvah, S., & Afriansyah, dan E. A. (2016). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa ditinjau melalui Model Pembelajaran SAVI dan Konvensional. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan, 2(2).

Wulansari, Ratna, Roesdiana, Lessa, dan Imami, A. I. (2019). Pengaruh Model Somatic Auditory Visualization Intellectualy (SAVI) terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 1(2).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v7i02.2117

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Lilis Harianti Hasibuan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Logaritma : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains

Tadris Matematika FTIK UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

ISSN: 2338-8706  (print), 2580-7145 (online)

Jl. T. Rizal Nurdin Km. 4,5 Sihitang Padangsidimpuan

Sumatera Utara 22733 Indonesia

Phone: 0634-22080 Fax: 0634-24022

Email: logaritma.tmm@gmail.com