Theoanthropocentric: Learning Strategies for Improving Students’ Conceptual Understanding

Muhammad Darwis Dasopang* -  Scopus ID: 57219916485 IAIN Padangsidimpuan, North Sumatera,, Indonesia
DOI : 10.24952/fitrah.v6i2.3594
Learning objectives can be achieved in various ways, one of which is by implementing learning strategies. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of Theoanthropocentric learning strategies for improving students’ conceptual understanding skills. The research population is all junior high school students (SMP), and the sample comprises students from class VIII. The random cluster sampling technique was used to choose the study’s sample. The data collection method used in this research is the conceptual understanding test. Descriptive and inferential statistics serve for data analysis, including the independent t-test. The results show a significant difference between the conceptual understanding of students who used Theoanthropocentric learning strategies and those who did not use Theoanthropocentric learning strategies. The descriptive statistical test results show that the students in the experimental group have a higher mean score than students in the control group. The independent t-test result has strengthened the statistical test results, namely, 0.00 (p < 0.05), from the finding, it follows that the application of theoanthropocentric learning strategies has an enormous impact on improving students’ conceptual understanding skills. Therefore, the Theoanthropocentric approach could be used as a solution to improve students’ conceptual understanding skills.

Keywords : Effectiveness; Learning strategies; Theoanthropocentric; Conceptual understanding; Knowledge

  1. Al Arifin, A. H. (2012). Implementasi pendidikan multikultural dalam praksis pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 1(1), 72-82. doi:10.21831/jppfa.v1i1.1052
  2. Al-Shehri, M. S. (2020). Effect of differentiated instruction on the achievement and development of critical thinking skills among sixth-grade science students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(10), 77-99. doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.10.5
  3. Andamon, J., & Tan, D. A. (2018). Conceptual understanding, attitude and performance in mathematics of grade 7 students. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(8), 96–105.
  4. Andayani, Y., Hadisaputra, S., & Hasnawati, H. (2018). Analysis of the level of conceptual understanding. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1095, p. 12045). doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1095/1/012045
  5. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., … Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  6. Asfar, A., & Asfar, A. (2020). Case-based games learning strategies to improve conceptual understanding in mathematics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1663, p. 12060). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012060
  7. Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Khairani, S. (2018). Effectiveness of adaptive contextual learning model of integrated science by integrating digital age literacy on grade VIII students. In Jurnal IOP Conferences Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 335, pp. 1–8). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012067
  8. Baloche, L., & Brody, C. M. (2017). Cooperative learning: Exploring challenges, crafting innovations. Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy, 43(3), 274-283. doi:10.1080/02607476.2017.1319513
  9. Bechter, B. E., Dimmock, J. A., & Jackson, B. (2019). A cluster-randomized controlled trial to improve student experiences in physical education: Results of a student-centered learning intervention with high school teachers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 45, 101553. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101553
  10. Biggerstaff, T. J., Mitbander, B. G., & Webster, D. E. (1994). Program understanding and the concept assignment problem. Communications of The ACM, 37(5), 72–82.
  11. Cameron, B. H. (2011). Experience-based learning. In Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-881-9.ch052
  12. Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & DiBiase, A.-M. (2003). Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education. New Jersey: Routledge.
  13. Corona, R., Alaniz, S., & Akata, Z. (2019). Modeling conceptual understanding in image reference games. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 1-11.
  14. Danver, S. L. (2016). Contextual teaching and learning. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education. doi:10.4135/9781483318332.n86
  15. Dasopang, M. D., Erawadi, A. S., Lubis, A. A., & Hasibuan, H. (2020). Analysis of students’ mental health after terror cases in Indonesia. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(2), 939–943.
  16. Diem, H. T. T., & Thathong, K. (2019). Enhancing the pre-service biology teachers to construct better lesson plans: A lesson study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 218–231.
  17. Ding, D., Guan, C., & Yu, Y. (2017). Game-based learning in tertiary education: A new learning experience for the generation Z. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(2), 148-152. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.2.857
  18. Donisch, K., Bray, C., & Gewirtz, A. (2016). Child welfare, juvenile justice, mental health, and education providers’ conceptualizations of trauma-informed practice. Child Maltreatment, 21(2), 125–134.
  19. Douglass, S. L., & Shaikh, M. A. (2004). Defining Islamic education: Differentiation and applications. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 7(1), 5-18.
  20. Edmondson, K. M. (2005). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. Assessing Science Understanding, 15-40. doi:10.1016/b978-012498365-6/50004-4
  21. Ehsan, N., Vida, S., & Mehdi, N. (2019). The impact of cooperative learning on developing speaking ability and motivation toward learning english. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 83-101. doi: 10.17323/jle.2019.9809
  22. Emaliana, I. (2017). Teacher-centered or student-centered learning approach to promote learning? Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 10(2), 59–70.
  23. Fajarini, U. (2016). Peranan kearifan lokal dalam pendidikan karakter. Sosio Didaktika: Social Science Education Journal, 2(3), 75–90. doi:10.15408/sd.v1i2.1225
  24. Fauzi, A., & Nikmatullah, C. (2016). Pelaksanaan pendidikan madrasah diniyah di kota Serang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1(2), 157–178.
  25. Feszterova, M., & Jomova, K. (2015). Character of innovations in environmental education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1697 – 1702. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.222
  26. Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2009). Enhancing students’ understanding of the concept ofchemical bondingby using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 289–310. doi:10.1002/tea.20278
  27. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman Publishing.
  28. Gani, A. (2019). Urgency education morals of sufism in millennial era. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 499–513.
  29. Geertz, C. (2013). Religion as a cultural system. In Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. doi:10.4324/9781315017570
  30. Gwen, G. D. (2012). Philosophy of religion. In The Routledge Companion to Theism. doi:10.4324/9780203123294
  31. Hsiao, E., Mikolaj, P., & Shih, Y. (2017). A design case of scaffolding hybrid/online student-centered learning with multimedia. Journal of Educators Online, 14(1), 1-9.
  32. Huck, S. W., Cormier, W. H., & Bounds, W. G. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper & Row
  33. Ismail, R., Awang, M., Pyng, S. Y., & Abdullah, M. R. B. (2020). Active learning in economic subject: a case study at secondary school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(10), 19-31. doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.10.2
  34. Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 137–164.
  35. Johnson, B. E. (2006). Contextual teaching and learning. Bandung: Mizan.
  36. Kalelkar, C. (2017). Classroom. Resonance, 22(7), 697-703. doi:10.1007/s12045-017-0513-y
  37. Kamaluddin, M., Adawiyah, A., & Rusdin, R. (2020). Improving emotional and spiritual intelligence of students through aqidah morals. International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education, 2(2), 91–107.
  38. Khatimah, H., & Sugiman, S. (2019). The effect of problem solving approach to mathematics problem solving ability in fifth grade. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, pp. 1–7). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042104
  39. Kim, J. (2018). Christian anthropology in an age of science: between anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism. The Expository Times, 129(12), 547–553.
  40. Kurniasih, A. W., Hidayah, I., & Asikin, M. (2020). Teacher support for eliciting students mathematical thinking: problem posing, asking questions, and song. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(10), 265-285. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.10.15
  41. Lubis, A. H., & Wangid, M. N. (2019). Augmented reality-assisted picture storybook: media to enhance discipline character of primary school students. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 11–20. doi:10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.13787
  42. Mackinnon, T. (2010). Contextual learning. The International Journal of The Arts in Society: Annual Review, 5(4), 225-232. doi:10.18848/1833-1866/cgp/v05i04/35881
  43. Marsh, M., Golledge, R., & Battersby, S. E. (2007). Geospatial concept understanding and recognition in g6–college students: A preliminary argument for minimal GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(4), 696–712.
  44. Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 2(3), 311–321.
  45. Palobo, M., Sianturi, M., Marlissa, I., Purwanty, R., Dadi, O., & Saparuddin, A. (2018). Analysis of teachers’ difficulties on developing curriculum 2013 lesson plans. In 1st International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2018). Atlantis Press.
  46. Perkinson, H. J. (2012). The culture of education. New Vico Studies. doi:10.5840/newvico19971510
  47. Putra, F., Nur Kholifah, I. Y., Subali, B., & Rusilowati, A. (2018). 5e-learning cycle strategy: Increasing conceptual understanding and learning motivation. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 171-181. doi: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2898
  48. Quay, J. (2003). Experience and participation: Relating theories of learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(2), 105–112.
  49. Rijal, S., Ilyasin, M., & Duraesa, M. A. (2017). Religion, theology and terrorism in Indonesia: Reconstruction of theo-anthropocentric theology. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 5(1), 36-46. doi: 10.15640/ijpt.v5n1a4
  50. Riswanto, A., & Aryani, S. (2017). Learning motivation and student achievement: Description analysis and relationships both. The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 2(1), 42–47.
  51. Rohmanu, A. (2019). Paradigma hukum islam teoantoposentris: Telaah paradigmatis pemikiran Fazlur Rahman dan Abdullah Saeed. Kodifikasia, 13(1), 45-66. doi:10.21154/kodifikasia.v13i1.1679
  52. Salleh, M. S. (2013). Strategizing Islamic education. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(6), 1-14.
  53. Santoso, T., Nafis, H. L. H., & Oktama, M. Y. (2019). Analyzing students’ error in problem solving of two-variable linear equation system: A case study of grade eight students of Indonesian junior high school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 283-296. 10.26803/ijlter.18.11.17
  54. Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-hill Companies.
  55. Satriani, I., Emilia, E., & Gunawan, H. (2015). Contextual teaching and learning approach to teaching writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 10-22. doi:10.17509/ijal.v2i1.70
  56. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Research in mathematics education. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 497-528. doi:10.3102/0091732X16658650
  57. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective sixth edition. Boston: Pearson.
  58. Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Maat, S. M. (2020). The effects of a discovery learning module on geometry for improving students’ mathematical reasoning skills, communication and self-confidence. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 214-228. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.3.12
  59. Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13, 43(1), 5–14. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.963370
  60. Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2017). Contextual learning: innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76.
  61. Tran, V. D., Nguyen, T. M. L., Van De, N., Soryaly, C., & Doan, M. N. (2019). Does cooperative learning may enhance the use of students’ learning strategies?. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 79–88.
  62. Wardani, A. D., Gunawan, I., Kusumaningrum, D. E., Benty, D. D. N., Sumarsono, R. B., Nurabadi, A., & Handayani, L. (2020). Student learning motivation: a conceptual paper. In 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020) (pp. 275–278). Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.201112.049
  63. Wolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology (13th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  64. Wong, K. M. (2020). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it” by Lee and Hannafin (2016): An International Perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–4. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09842-w

Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Muhammad Darwis Dasopang
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman
Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia
Jl. T. Rizal Nurdin Km. 4,5 Sihitang, Kota Padang Sidempuan
Phone: 0634-22080
Website: http://jurnal.iain-padangsidimpuan.ac.id/index.php/F/
Email: fitrah@iain-padangsidimpuan.ac.id

E-ISSN : 2460-2345

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.