PEMBELAJARAN RANAH AFEKTIF ANTARA HARAPAN DAN KENYATAAN

Muhammad Yusup Pulungan* -  Dosen Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia
Today many parties are demanding an increasing in the intensity and quality of implementation of affective education in formal educational institutions. This situation has stirred the collective consciousness of the need to reinvigorate our nation's morality dimension. It could be argued, the moral crisis that hit the nation became increasingly marked by rampant sexual acts, violence, murder,  gambling, pornography, rising juvenile delinquency cases, the number of drug addicts and drinking and other social diseases spreading more chronic. According to the social observer, a moral crisis as it is partly the fault of national educational institutions has not considered optimal in shaping the personality of students. It so happens because the valuation models that apply to some subjects related to education during this value only measures cognitive ability learners.   One attempt was made  expectations ahead to rebuild the lost character of the nation is the rise of integrated education patterns applied to the school system. Patterns of integration are not only transferring knowledge to students, but the coaching attitude  emphasis on education also  influences the affective domain of teaching and learning activities in the system. There are still a lot of flaws and things  -  other things that have to be met and continue to be improved in the system development of the affective domain in education. Thus this paper is born with an explanation of how the ideal application of the affective domain in education was implemented as much as possible either at school, in the family or in the neighbourhood as a whole is indispensable in order to regrow the lost character of the nation.
  1. Moh. Yamin, Menggugat Pendidikan Indonesia Belajar dari Paulo Freire dan Ki Hajar Dewantara, Cet. I, Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2009.
  2. Ketetapan MPR RI No. IV/MPR/1999, UUD 1945, Amandemen I,II,III,IV, Surabaya: Penerbit Apollo, t.t.
  3. Zubaedi, Pendidikan Berbasis Masyarakat Upaya Menawarkan Solusi Terhadap Berbagai Problem Sosial, Cet. I, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.
  4. Suyanto, Refleksi dan Reformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia Memasuki Millenium Ketiga, Co”et. II, Yogyakarta: Adi Cita Karya Nusa, 2002.
  5. Nurul Zuriah, Pendidikan Moral dan Budi Pekerti Dalam Persfektif Perubahan; Menggagas Platform Pendidikan Budi Pekerti Secara Kontekstual dan Futuristik, Cet. II, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.
  6. Kitab Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
  7. W.S. Winkel , Psikologi Pengajaran, Cet. VII, Yogyakarta: Media Abadi, 2005.
  8. Wina Sanjaya, Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan, Cet. VII, Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.
  9. Rohmat Mulyana, Mengartikulasikan Pendidikan Nilai, Cet. I, Bandung: Alfabeta,CV, 2004
  10. W. Gulo, Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Cet. IV, Jakarta: Grasindo, 2008.
  11. Darmiyati Zuchdi, Humanisasi Pendidikan Menemukan Kembali Pendidikan Yang Manusiawi, Cet. I, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.
  12. Teuku Ramli Zakaria, “Pendekatan-Pendekatan Pendidikan Nilai dan Implementasinya Dalam Pendidikan Budi Pekerti” dalam Jurnal
  13. Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Jakarta, Balitbang Depdiknas, Oktober 2000, No, 026.
  14. Noeng Muhadjir, Ilmu Pendidikan dan Perubahan Nilai, Yogyakarta: Rakesarasin, 1987.
  15. Naquib al-Attas, Aims and Objectives of Islamic, Jeddah, King Abdul Aziz, tt.

Jurusan Pendidikan Agama Islam UIN Syahada Padangsidimpuan

Jln. T. Rizal Nurdin Km 4,5 Sihitang Kampus Utama IAIN Padangsidimpuan 22733

e-mail: darulilmitarbiyah@gmail.com

 P-ISSN: 2338-8692        E-ISSN: 2715-6745

Web jurnal: http://jurnal.iain-padangsidimpuan.ac.id/index.php/DI


View My Stats

Flag Counter